![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year One: | The Post-Election Year | |
| Year Two: | The Mid-Term Year | |
| Year Three: | The Pre-Election Year | |
| Year Four: | The Election Year |
With dividends included, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has been up 100% of the time in the pre-election year (year 3) since 1933, averaging a return of nearly 21%.
Our theory is that the market anticipates the business-friendly behavior of the dominant political party leading up to the presidential election. Politicians know that the surest way to be turned out of office is to preside over a recession or what is perceived to be a poor economic climate. As Bill Clinton so masterfully put it: "It's the economy, stupid!"
Most major bear markets since World War II have been contained in years one and two of the four-year cycle. The first three quarters of year two are particularly dangerous. The second and third quarters have lost 4000 Dow points since 1902; 3500 Dow points in the third quarter alone.
The market tends to recover in the fourth quarter of year two. Since 1902, this quarter has added 2800 Dow points. Since 1953, it is the best quarter in the cycle, averaging a gain of 8.1% plus dividends. Combined with the pre-election year (year three), this quarter creates a 15-month period of consistent and exceptional gains historically. Since 1933, the Dow Industrials have been up 100% of the time during this period, with dividends included, averaging a total return of about 29%.
Alpha's E-System portfolio adopts a fully-invested position in the market during this 15-month period, which we call the market's "sweet spot". Our portfolio is equally divided between the S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100. We use the NASDAQ 100 because its performance during the "sweet spot" has been exceptional and because it provides us with exposure to the top technology companies in the U.S.
Over the past 20 years, the five sweet spots alone, invested as described above, without interest earned in the intervening months, returned 11.5% annually. All five were positive. The Dow Industrials averaged a return of 9.9% over the same period. The bottom line: this simple strategy beat the market over a 20-year period while being invested in stocks just one-third of the time. Moreover, the 20-year period included one of the greatest bull market decades of all time - the 1990's.
The E-System Portfolio also exploits the market's tendency to generate consistently higher returns in late-November, around Thanksgiving, and in late-December, around Christmas. In the fourth quarters not contained in the market's sweet spot (Q4 of the election year, Q4 of the post-election year), we hold money market funds and make two holiday trades using the Russell 2000 small-cap index. These trades total 16 days - the last 6 days of November through the third trading day of December, and the last seven days of December. Since 1979, these two trades have averaged a return of nearly 5%, with a 90% win rate.
The remaining nine quarters are invested in short to intermediate bonds. The asset allocation over the complete four-year election cycle, then, looks like this:
|
Alpha E-System Model Portofolio
Quarterly Allocation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details on this strategy are provided in Alpha's research paper "The E-System: How to Exploit the Hidden Bull Market", by Dr. Arthur J. Minton (2009).
Disclosure: Past performance is not a guarantee of future performance. The E-System Portfolio strategy uses a precise asset allocation formula that utilizes the S&P 500 index, the NASDAQ 100 index, and the Russell 2000 index, and a combination of two PIMCO fixed-income funds.
The S&P 500, the NASDAQ 100 and the Russell 2000 are indexes which cannot be used in actual investing. Alpha accounts use index funds that replicate the S&P 500, the NASDAQ 100 and the Russell 2000 but which may vary from the index returns. The presentation also utilizes PIMCO funds during periods when the model is invested in fixed-income. During these periods, the portfolio is equally allocated between the PIMCO Low Duration Fund and the PIMCO Total Return Fund.
The data presented do not take into consideration fees, expenses or trading costs. This strategy may be executed using variable annuity company products which may increase the total expense factor. In some cases, the expense factor will remain unaffected due to lower management fees from Alpha. These expense factors cannot be quantified in advance. Potential investors should inquire as to the exact additional costs of these investment venues.
Model results, being hypothetical, have inherent limitations due to the fact that they do not reflect actual trading and may not reflect the impact that material economic and market factors might have had on the advisor's decision-making if actual client funds had been invested in the model strategy. No matter how positive the model returns have been over any time period, the potential for loss is always present due to factors in the future which may not be accounted for in the model. Please see full disclosure on the model portfolio performance page.